Home › Research › Carbon Markets & CBAM
✓ Live Financial Phase Analysis (Sept 2026)
The CBAM-CCTS Article 9 Deduction: What Indian Exporters Must Document to Reduce Their CBAM Certificate Obligations
Article 9 of the CBAM Regulation allows an EU importer to reduce its CBAM certificate obligation by the carbon price effectively paid in the country of origin. With the CCTS active compliance market launching in October 2026, this is a real but structurally limited mechanism. The deduction is based on the effective carbon price paid across total emissions, not the headline marginal carbon credit price, creating a severe dilution effect for Indian exporters.
Key Takeaways
- Article 9 of the CBAM Regulation provides that the quantity of CBAM certificates an authorised declarant must surrender may be reduced by the carbon price effectively paid in the country of origin on the embedded emissions of the imported goods. That reduction applies only where the carbon price was actually paid under a mandatory carbon-pricing mechanism, rather than through a voluntary offset or unrelated green premium.
- For India, the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) launching active exchange trading next month (October 2026) is the relevant domestic carbon-pricing mechanism that may support an Article 9 claim, subject to pending EU technical recognition. Costs linked to hydrogen premiums or renewable procurement preferences do not qualify unless they form part of the actual mandatory compliance cost.
- The central trap for exporters in a baseline-and-credit system like CCTS is that the EU is unlikely to recognise the marginal carbon-credit exchange price as the deductible amount. Instead, Article 9 looks to the carbon price effectively paid across the relevant emissions base. If a plant buys credits only for emissions above its target baseline, the effective price per tonne emitted is heavily diluted.
- At projected Phase 1 CCTS economics (₹600–900/tCO₂e), the deduction will likely cover only a tiny fraction of the gross CBAM liability for a typical Indian BF-BOF exporter. Material border relief requires tighter domestic baselines or a substantially higher effective domestic carbon price.
- The documentation burden is significant. Exporters and their EU importers must show verified emissions data, proof of CCTS compliance via registry receipts, and a clear mathematical link between the domestic carbon-price payment and the specific imported goods.
How the deduction works
The practical logic is straightforward. If an Indian producer has already borne a mandatory carbon cost domestically, the EU should not charge the same emissions twice through CBAM. The challenge is that Article 9 does not credit domestic policy on a one-for-one political basis; it credits only the carbon price that can be shown to have been effectively paid.
That makes the deduction more technical than it first appears. The exporter must identify the relevant production period, verify the emissions, establish the domestic carbon compliance cost incurred on the new CCTS exchanges, and show how that cost maps to the goods exported to the EU. The EU importer then uses that evidence in the CBAM declaration.
The distinction between a headline carbon-credit price and an effective carbon price is especially important in India. Under an intensity-based baseline-and-credit system, a plant pays only for the portion of its emissions that exceed its designated Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity (GEI) target. That structure sharply dilutes the deductible amount under Article 9.
Illustrative scenario: The Dilution Effect
To show the mechanics, consider a hypothetical Indian BF-BOF steel plant with annual production of 5 MMT, an export volume of 2 MMT to the EU, actual emissions intensity of 2.15 tCO₂/t steel, and a CCTS target of 2.10 tCO₂/t.
2. CCTS Compliance Shortfall: Shortfall = 0.05 tCO₂/t across total production (2.15 actual - 2.10 target). Total shortfall = 0.05 tCO₂/t × 5 MMT = 250,000 tonnes. If CCCs cost Rs 700 each: 250,000 × Rs 700 = Rs 17.5 crore (~€1.9 million).
3. Effective Carbon Price Dilution: Total plant emissions = 2.15 tCO₂/t × 5 MMT = 10.75 million tonnes. Effective price = €1.9 million ÷ 10.75 million tonnes = €0.17 per tonne.
Result: Even if the EU recognizes the CCTS, the importer can only deduct €0.17 for every tonne of embedded emissions, leaving a net CBAM levy of €83.83 per tonne. The marginal credit cost (Rs 700) does not apply.
Under that scenario, the Article 9 deduction provides only a tiny share of the gross CBAM bill. The key point is that the deduction is not based on the marginal credit price alone; it is based on the carbon price effectively paid spread over the entire relevant emissions base.
What to document
The exact documentary format may evolve as CBAM implementation guidance is finalised, but Indian exporters should prepare evidence in four broad categories as CCTS trading launches:
- Proof of CCTS compliance for the relevant period (Grid Controller of India registry data).
- Verified emissions data tied to the production batch or plant period (ACVA audit reports).
- Proof of carbon-price payment through the domestic mechanism (exchange transaction receipts from IEX/PXIL).
- A production allocation calculation showing how the paid carbon cost maps specifically to the exported goods.
The EU importer or authorised declarant must retain this evidence to support the annual CBAM declaration. The most important issue is traceability: the regulator needs to see that the domestic carbon cost was mandatory, paid, verified, and directly attributable to the imported product.
Timing and deadlines
The first CBAM annual definitive declaration for calendar-year 2026 imports is legally due on 30 September 2027. That is the first major filing point at which Article 9 deductions for 2026 import flows will be claimed.
Exporters cannot wait until 2027 to assemble the file. CCTS compliance audits, registry holding certificates, and production mapping must be prepared concurrently with the October 2026 trading launch so the EU importer can make the claim cleanly.
Policy implications for India
From India’s perspective, Article 9 creates a direct link between domestic climate policy and export competitiveness. It does not eliminate CBAM exposure, but it can reduce it where a credible domestic carbon price has already been paid. The recent BRICS New Delhi Declaration (September 2026) highlights India's diplomatic push to force the EU to formally accredit these Global South pricing mechanisms.
The commercial downside is that the current intensity-based CCTS structure translates into a massive dilution effect under CBAM. Unless the domestic baseline system becomes drastically tighter, the effective carbon price will remain too low to offset much of the EU charge.
Bottom line: Article 9 is a real channel for reducing CBAM liability, but it is not a simple one-for-one credit for every domestic compliance rupee spent. For Indian exporters, the deduction depends on proving an effective carbon price was paid and cleanly allocated to the imported goods. In its Phase 1 form, the financial relief will be modest. The strategic priority is therefore documentation quality—meticulously archiving CCTS exchange receipts to defend the claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a CCTS surplus entity claim an Article 9 deduction?
Usually not. A deduction requires demonstrating an actual mandatory carbon-price payment tied to the relevant emissions. If a firm generates surplus credits and sells them, it has not paid a carbon price on the imported goods; it has generated revenue.
Does Article 9 apply separately to Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for aluminium?
The answer depends on the exact CBAM methodology for the product category and the domestic accounting rules used under CCTS. The key question is whether the domestic carbon price can be accurately traced to the specific embedded emissions (direct or indirect) that the EU recognizes for that specific import.
When can Indian exporters first claim an Article 9 deduction?
The first opportunity is the annual CBAM definitive declaration for 2026 imports, legally due by 30 September 2027. Exporters must have ACVA verification, CCTS registry receipts, and product-level allocation data ready well before this deadline to allow importers to file accurately.
Sources & Further Reading
- European Commission — CBAM Regulation (EU) 2023/956, specifically Article 9 (Carbon price paid in a third country)
- CERC — CCTS Trading Regulations (2026) regarding compliance settlement
- Ministry of External Affairs, India — BRICS New Delhi Declaration (September 2026)