Home › Research › CCTS Compliance Operations MRV
Cross-Cutting · CCTS · ComplianceIndia's CCTS Compliance Cycle: What Obligated Entities Must Do Before June 2026 and Why the ACVA Shortage Is the Biggest Operational Risk
The Indian Carbon Market Portal launched on March 21, 2026, at the Prakriti 2026 International Conference on Carbon Markets in New Delhi. Approximately 490 entities across seven sectors (aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, pulp and paper, petroleum refining, petrochemicals, and textiles) now have legally binding GEI targets beginning from FY2025-26. The first verified GHG report, known as Form A, is due approximately four months after FY2025-26 closes, setting a hard deadline around July 31, 2026. This report must be verified by a BEE-Accredited Carbon Verification Agency. Alarmingly, only 50 to 60 ACVAs are provisionally active against a compliance universe of nearly 500 entities. The April 2026 milestone requiring the submission of a 5-year action plan and an annual activity plan for FY26 is already here. The June 2026 Form A deadline is a mere eleven weeks away. This article maps the complete CCTS compliance cycle, detailing what each form requires, outlining what the severe ACVA bottleneck means for scheduling, and explaining how the ICM Portal launch radically changes the practical compliance landscape for obligated entities across all notified sectors.
Seven of nine CCTS sectors currently operate under legally binding compliance obligations starting from FY2025-26: aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, and pulp and paper were gazette-notified on October 8, 2025, while petroleum refining, petrochemicals, and textiles followed on January 16, 2026. Iron and steel, alongside fertilisers, still remain pending final gazette notification. The ICM Portal officially launched on March 21, 2026. The major April 2026 milestone, demanding the 5-year action plan and FY26 annual activity plan, is now due. The impending ACVA-verified Form A deadline (approximately July 31, 2026, for FY2025-26) remains the next critical operational date for all notified entities. The first CCC trading sessions on power exchanges are expected to open between mid-2026 and October 2026.
Key Takeaways
Approximately 490 entities across seven sectors face legally binding CCTS compliance obligations for FY2025-26. Iron and steel (roughly 253 entities, predominantly in Chhattisgarh and Odisha) and fertilisers (about 20 entities) remain pending final gazette notification. However, they should treat the June 2025 draft as their active compliance reference since their compliance year has already begun. The total universe, once all nine sectors are officially notified, will reach roughly 740 entities covering over 700 Mt CO₂e. This will make the CCTS one of the largest emissions trading systems in the world by coverage volume.
The first compliance cycle revolves around two primary output documents. Form A (the Performance Assessment Document) must be submitted within four months of the financial year close, hitting approximately July 31, 2026. Crucially, it must be verified by a BEE-accredited ACVA before submission. Form D (the Compliance Assessment Document) is submitted within two weeks of the last trading session and summarizes the CCCs generated, purchased, and surrendered. Final compliance must be finalized within nine months of the cycle end. Failing to comply triggers an Environmental Compensation penalty set at twice the average traded CCC price.
The ACVA bottleneck remains the most underappreciated operational risk of CCTS Phase 1. Only 50 to 60 ACVAs are provisionally active according to the TIC Council India and BEE. Set against a compliance universe of roughly 490 entities, each demanding an annual site audit, data review, and verification report, the ratio drops to approximately 8 to 10 entities per ACVA. Conflict of interest rules and the geographic concentration of verifiers in major cities will drastically shrink effective capacity even further. Entities without a contracted ACVA for FY2025-26 are at immense risk of missing the July 31 deadline.
The Indian Carbon Market Portal, launched on March 21, 2026, acts as the central digital backbone of the entire market. It controls end-to-end processes: entity registration, MRV document management, ACVA validation, CCC issuance, and registry operations managed by the Grid Controller of India Limited. The portal also features Article 6 Paris Agreement functionality tailored for cross-border crediting, positioning India to cleanly link with international carbon markets in the future. All FY2025-26 compliance submissions must flow exclusively through this portal.
Phase 1 GEI reduction ambitions (FY2025-26) are relatively modest, demanding approximately 1 to 3 percent across most sectors. This will tighten significantly to 2 to 8 percent in Phase 2 (FY2026-27). Iron and steel entities face a 2 to 3 percent reduction in Phase 1, tightening to 4 to 6 percent in Phase 2. Cement targets roughly 2 percent initially, increasing to up to 3 percent. These targets are intensity-based; a plant growing production faster than its GEI falls will still rapidly accumulate a CCC deficit. While CCTS allows unlimited banking of surplus CCCs for future use, it strictly forbids borrowing future CCCs for current compliance.
The compliance calendar: What must happen and when
India's CCTS compliance cycle dictates a very specific sequence of milestones that obligated entities must navigate carefully for FY2025-26. Several of these key milestones are already behind us or immediately current. Understanding this precise sequence is critical. Any delays, particularly regarding ACVA engagements, will compound rapidly and make hitting the final July 31 Form A deadline mathematically impossible, regardless of how good internal data systems might be.
All GEI targets are benchmarked strictly against FY2023-24 actual performance. Any entity that has not yet reconstructed its FY2023-24 gate-to-gate GHG inventory with the exact precision demanded by CCTS compliance (tracking Scope 1 fuel-specific NCVs, utilizing CEA grid emission factors for Scope 2, and applying sector-specific methodologies for process emissions) needs to do so immediately. This data forms the absolute foundation for all subsequent reporting.
Obligated entities were legally required to submit their Monitoring and Verification Plans. These plans described internal data collection systems, metering infrastructure, emission factor sourcing, planned ACVA engagements, and all internal GHG accounting procedures. Entities that failed to submit an MRV plan or submitted incomplete documentation must rectify this instantly.
The October 8, 2025 gazette locked in targets for aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, and pulp and paper. These final targets landed approximately 16 percent less stringent than the original April 2025 draft, reflecting a prorated adjustment acknowledging the late notification. The January 16, 2026 gazette followed up with petroleum refining, petrochemicals, textiles, and secondary aluminium. From these respective publication dates, compliance became legally binding for the FY2025-26 period.
Power Minister Manohar Lal Khattar formally launched the Indian Carbon Market Portal. This portal serves as the primary digital infrastructure for all CCTS processes, managing entity registrations, MRV workflows, ACVA accreditations, CCC issuances by the BEE, and overarching registry operations executed by the Grid Controller of India Limited. It also handles the complex trading platform connectivity required for the power exchanges.
This milestone is actively current. Obligated entities must finalize and submit their 5-year climate action plans alongside their annual activity plan for FY2025-26 directly through the ICM Portal. These vital documents explicitly describe the entity's GEI reduction roadmap, verify planned abatement investments, justify technology choices, and outline a long-term compliance strategy. ACVAs will actively reference these plans during their verification audits. An entity failing to submit an action plan is actively breaching a current compliance obligation.
This is the most critical near-term deadline. Within roughly four months of the FY2025-26 close, obligated entities must submit Form A to the BEE through the ICM Portal. Form A demands total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, exact production volumes, GEI achieved versus target, and the final CCC surplus or deficit calculation. Most importantly, Form A must be verified by a BEE-accredited ACVA before submission. The ACVA is required to execute site visits, extensive document reviews, and data verification before issuing a formal Verification Report. The BEE then conducts a completeness check over 10 working days, followed by a technical review spanning 30 days before ever issuing a single CCC. Entities lacking a contracted ACVA right now are at extreme risk of missing this deadline entirely.
CCC trading will officially commence across India's regulated power exchanges (IEX, PXIL, and HPOWERT) under the strict oversight of the CERC. Over-the-counter (OTC) trading is strictly prohibited during Phase 1. There are no derivatives allowed, and short selling is banned. However, entities enjoy unlimited banking of surplus CCCs to apply to future compliance years. Borrowing future CCCs to cover current deficits is not permitted. The exact price collar (the floor and ceiling limits) has not yet been publicly finalized, though analysts heavily estimate the range between Rs 600 to Rs 1,200 per tCO₂e.
Within two weeks of the final trading session, Form D must be submitted. This document clearly summarizes the entity's ultimate compliance position, detailing all CCCs generated via a Form A surplus, CCCs actively purchased on the exchange, and the final total of CCCs surrendered to cover obligations. Entities that missed their original GEI target must prove they purchased adequate CCCs prior to this deadline to avoid triggering Environmental Compensation.
Within nine months of the financial year closing, the entity must definitively prove full compliance. If the target wasn't met internally or covered via Form D purchases, the Central Pollution Control Board immediately imposes Environmental Compensation. This penalty equals twice the average price at which CCCs actively traded throughout the compliance year. Expecting a CCC price near Rs 800/tCO₂e, this translates to a massive Rs 1,600/tCO₂e penalty for every single tonne of deficit, easily dwarfing the basic cost of timely abatement investments.
What Form A requires: The GHG accounting precision that matters
Form A is not a casual, high-level summary. It functions as a meticulous plant-level GHG emission inventory, verified against standards parallel to a statutory financial audit. The CCTS gate-to-gate methodology demands that entities ruthlessly account for every significant emission source inside the plant boundaries. This includes exact fuel combustion tracking utilizing actual net calorific values, measuring complex process emissions (like calcination in cement, PFC in aluminium, and N₂O in nitric acid), tracking electricity consumption against the latest CEA grid emission factors, and accounting for imported steam. Biomass emissions, internal renewable energy generation, and carbon capture initiatives are strictly excluded from the positive intensity calculations.
The core GEI formula simply divides total GHG emissions (in tCO₂e) by the total units of equivalent product produced. If the achieved GEI falls below the target GEI, the entity earns CCCs. If it exceeds the target, the entity must purchase them. Because everything hinges on the denominator (units of equivalent product), the absolute precision of production tracking is vital, particularly for multi-product plants or facilities facing heavy production variability throughout the year.
Due: Approx July 31, 2026 (4 months after FY close).
Verified by: BEE-accredited ACVA (Mandatory).
Contains: Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions, exact production volumes, GEI achieved versus target, the resulting CCC surplus or deficit calculation, and any necessary MRV plan updates.
BEE review: Requires a 10-day completeness check followed by a 30-day technical review before any CCCs are issued.
Applies to: Non-obligated entities registering voluntary offset projects.
Purpose: Used to officially register eligible offset projects (such as RE installations, green hydrogen, mangroves, or biogas) for CCC issuance under the voluntary mechanism.
Note: Not directly relevant to standard compliance-mechanism obligated entities unless they are independently registering voluntary projects.
Applies to: Voluntary offset project developers.
Purpose: Acts as the annual monitoring report for ongoing offset projects, actively demonstrating the emission reductions achieved against the originally approved methodology.
Verified by: Must be passed through an ACVA before any CCC issuance occurs under the offset mechanism.
Due: Within 2 weeks of the final trading session.
Verified by: Self-submitted to summarize trading activity.
Contains: Breakdown of CCCs generated from a Form A surplus, CCCs purchased on the exchange, total CCCs surrendered, and the net compliance position.
Triggers: If a deficit remains uncovered, the CPCB steps in and imposes Environmental Compensation at twice the average traded CCC price.
Phase 1 and Phase 2 reduction targets: What is actually required
| Sector | Gazette Date (Final) | Phase 1 Reduction (FY2025-26) | Phase 2 Reduction (FY2026-27) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | October 8, 2025 | Approx 1.7 to 2% | Approx 3 to 4% | Sector average GEI sits at roughly 16.98 tCO₂/t compared to a global average of 15.1. Covers Scope 1 and 2. Renewable energy transition remains the dominant lever. |
| Cement | October 8, 2025 | Approx 2% | Approx 2.5 to 3% | Covers 187 entities, predominantly in Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan. White cement remains the highest GEI sub-sector at roughly 0.93 tCO₂/t clinker. |
| Chlor-alkali | October 8, 2025 | Approx 1 to 2% | Approx 2 to 4% | Covers Scope 1 and 2. Transitioning to membrane cell technology acts as the key abatement lever, heavily influenced by electricity inputs. |
| Pulp and paper | October 8, 2025 | Approx 1 to 2% | Approx 2 to 4% | Features a massively wide GEI range across its sub-sectors: integrated, RCF-based, agro-based, and specialty papers. |
| Petroleum refining | January 16, 2026 | Approx 1 to 2% | Approx 2 to 4% | Covers 21 refineries. IOCL Guwahati flags the highest GEI at roughly 7.77 tCO₂e/MBBL, while Reliance Jamnagar SEZ holds the lowest. |
| Petrochemicals | January 16, 2026 | Approx 1 to 2% | Approx 2 to 4% | Includes highly feedstock-intensive processes. GEI accounting is incredibly complex due to the heavy reliance on multiple co-products. |
| Textiles | January 16, 2026 | Approx 2% | Approx 2.5% | Spans 4 sub-sectors. The composite sub-sector faces the highest ambition gap, sitting near 7.24 tCO₂e/t. |
| Iron and steel | Pending (Drafted June 2025) | 2 to 3% (Draft) | 4 to 6% (Draft) | Expected to cover 253 entities, heavily concentrated in Chhattisgarh and Odisha. The BF sub-sector baseline is 2.36 tCO₂/t. Ferro alloys remain the highest intensity producers. |
| Fertiliser | Pending (Drafted June 2025) | Approx 1 to 2% (Draft) | Approx 2 to 4% (Draft) | Encompasses about 20 major plants. N₂O abatement serves as the single highest-leverage investment available to the sector. |
The ACVA bottleneck: Why this is the most urgent operational risk
A recent TIC Council India analysis delivered to the BEE highlighted a massive, structural capacity shortage inside the CCTS verification infrastructure. Currently, only 50 to 60 ACVAs are provisionally active and qualified to execute CCTS verification work. Pitted against an active compliance universe of roughly 490 entities across seven sectors, this leaves only 8 to 10 entities per ACVA during Phase 1. Once iron and steel and fertilisers officially join, this ratio will stretch to an unmanageable 12 to 15 entities per ACVA.
The verification workload is grueling. An ACVA team must complete extensive multi-day site audits for massive industrial facilities. They are required to independently review fuel consumption logs, audit production records and unit conversions, meticulously verify NCV test certificates, cross-reference electricity purchases against grid factors, and properly assess complex process emissions. For a major aluminium smelter or petroleum refinery, compiling the final Verification Report often requires weeks of post-audit office work.
Furthermore, the TIC Council flagged two compounding issues crippling this limited capacity. First, glaring conflicts of interest exist. A massive portion of provisionally accredited ACVAs actively provide carbon accounting advisory services to the very industrial entities they are supposed to audit. The BEE has been pressured to issue strict conflict-of-interest guidelines but has failed to finalize them. Second, geographic concentration is a major hurdle. Most active ACVAs operate out of major hubs like Mumbai and Delhi, while the heaviest concentration of compliance entities sits deep in Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and Jharkhand. The travel logistics actively consume capacity that isn't reflected in the basic verifier-to-entity ratios.
Any obligated entity lacking a contracted ACVA for FY2025-26 verification must treat this failure as a board-level emergency. The immediate steps are clear. First, identify provisionally accredited ACVAs from the BEE's published list and vigorously confirm their sector-specific competency. Process emissions in aluminium require distinct PFC expertise that a general auditor lacks. Second, absolutely confirm the ACVA has zero conflicts of interest with your facility. Third, lock in a contract immediately, ensuring site visits are solidly scheduled for May or June 2026 to allow ample time for report finalization before the July 31 deadline. Simultaneously, execute the April 2026 obligation by submitting the 5-year climate action plan and FY26 annual activity plan directly through the ICM Portal. An entity attempting to secure an ACVA in late April 2026 may find it completely impossible to meet the July 31 deadline. Capacity is already exhausted and will only tighten further.
The ICM Portal: What the March 21 launch changes
The Indian Carbon Market Portal, officially activated on March 21, 2026, serves as the central digital nervous system making CCTS compliance fully operational rather than merely a theoretical regulatory framework. Prior to its launch, the compliance mandates existed in legal documents but desperately lacked the digital architecture required for entities to register, upload, and interact with the trading markets. The portal definitively closes this gap.
For the obligated entities, the portal handles every necessary function. It manages profile setups, handles MRV plan submissions with strict version controls, routes Form A uploads directly into the ACVA verification workflows, and facilitates the final CCC issuances handled by the BEE. It seamlessly connects with the registry operations managed by the Grid Controller of India Limited and opens the doors for exchange connectivity.
Crucially, the portal includes Article 6 Paris Agreement functionality, a massive step for long-term market expansion. India's National Designated Authority is already established, and the portal is actively designed to let developers register projects intended for cross-border crediting. This allows Indian industrial decarbonisation projects to generate CCCs tradeable within European or other national markets under Article 6.2 bilateral agreements. This functionality promises to inject massive international demand into the domestic market.
While the ICM Portal launch is a monumental step, it does not mean CCC trading is fully operational today. As of April 2026, the Grid Controller of India Limited registry, responsible for physically holding and transferring CCC balances, is still heavily engaged in integration testing with the power exchange trading systems. CERC oversight is firmly established, but the critical price collar outlining the floor and ceiling limits has not been publicly notified for Phase 1. The Power Minister targeted mid-2026 for the first trades, but many analysts believe October 2026 is far more realistic if registry integration stalls. Entities earning a CCC surplus from Form A cannot monetize their credits until trading officially begins. Fortunately, the surplus safely accrues to their registry accounts from the moment of BEE issuance and can be banked indefinitely for future years.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many entities currently have legally binding CCTS compliance obligations and what are their sectors?
As of April 2026, roughly 490 entities across seven sectors operate under legally binding GEI targets. These include aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, and pulp and paper (all notified in October 2025), alongside petroleum refining, petrochemicals, and textiles (notified in January 2026). Iron and steel, encompassing about 253 entities, and fertilisers, covering around 20 major plants, remain in draft status pending their final gazette notification. Once fully notified, the system will manage roughly 740 entities covering over 700 Mt CO₂e annually, securing its place as one of the world's largest emissions trading systems.
What is the Form A deadline and what happens if an entity misses it?
Form A, the Performance Assessment Document, must be submitted within four months of the financial year close, falling approximately on July 31, 2026. It must carry verification from a BEE-accredited ACVA. Once submitted, the BEE executes a 10-day completeness check followed by a 30-day technical review before issuing any CCCs. Missing this deadline paralyzes an entity's compliance cycle. If they subsequently fail to meet their GEI target and cannot surrender the required CCCs, the Central Pollution Control Board leverages an Environmental Compensation penalty set at twice the average traded CCC price. This penalty is mathematically devastating compared to simply purchasing credits.
Why are ACVAs in short supply and what can obligated entities do?
The TIC Council India reports only 50 to 60 provisionally active ACVAs are currently available for CCTS verification. Against a fast-growing roster of roughly 490 to 740 entities, this ratio is fundamentally broken given the extreme demands of site visits and reporting. Severe conflicts of interest and geographic limitations reduce this tight capacity even further. Entities must secure ACVA contracts immediately, verify strict sector-specific competencies, ensure zero conflicts of interest exist, and explicitly schedule site visits for May or June to guarantee they hit the July 31 reporting deadline.